Paradigmatic shifts in visual arts: from technical instruction to its value within individuals

Authors

  • Adriana Salazar Lamadrid

Keywords:

paradigm, visual arts, research, teaching, and learning

Abstract

The purpose of this work is to establish the paradigmatic shift between the teaching of visual arts as technical value and its benefits in individuals. Historically, following UNESCO's post-war efforts, art began to acquire a special value in contributing to personal development. It was no longer just about art for art's sake, but art in relation to society. This marked the beginning of a lengthy process of rupture, resulting in changes in the value of arts and their relationship with teaching and learning processes. It took over 30 years for research in the arts to transform technical processes into a set of benefits for individuals. While it is expected that research in the humanities be linked to teaching and learning processes, in practice, this connection is often challenging to achieve. However, examples exist of studies in the arts and their relationship with other disciplinary areas, such as sociocultural studies by Mayor (1980), socio-political studies by Wye and Weitman (2006), and semiotics studies on form and function by Griffinths, Melot, Field, and Béguin (1988). There is an overwhelming amount of research on technical processes but with limited connection to their benefits for individuals. It is from the early works of Vigotsky in the thirties, gaining more strength with Eisner in 1965 and Gardner in 1994 to the present, that the benefits of the arts in human achievement have been studied. The aspects previously mentioned serve to conjecture a paradigmatic shift in the Kuhnian sense (1962) of the term. If by paradigm we understand: 1) the structure of normal science, that is, what a group of scientists in a specific area do or investigate—in this case, what is investigated is art for art's sake. 2) If we understand the essential sense of paradigm as the example, in this case, we refer to what exemplifies the new research practices of researchers in a knowledge area. Therefore, it is no longer just about art for art's sake but about art and its effects on individuals. This work accounts for this shift.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

De Gunther, L., & Salazar Lamadrid, A. (2015). Ciencia y arte en la producción plástica de Julie Mehretu. Paper presented at the Palas y las Musas: diálogos entre la ciencia y arte, Guanajuato, México.

De Gunther, L., & Salazar Lamadrid, A. (2016). Arte y ciencia en la producción gráfica de Alberto Durero. Palas y las Musas: diálogos entre la ciencia y arte. Universidad Nacional Automóma de México.

Eisner, E. W. (2011). El arte y la creación de la mente. El papel de las artes visuales en la transformación de la conciencia. España: Paídos.

Field, R. S., Melot, M., Griffiths, A., & Bâeguin, A. (1981). Prints. New York: Rizzoli.

Gardner, H. (2001). Estructuras de la Mente. La Teoría de Las Inteligencias Múltiples. Colombia: Fondo de Cultura Económica.

Gardner, H. (2005). Inteligencias Múltiples: La teoría en la práctica. España: Paidós.

Gardner, H. (2010). La inteligencia Reformulada: las inteligencias múltiples en el siglo XXI. España: Paidós.

Gardner, H. (2011). Educación artística y Desarrollo Humano. España: Paidós.

Hayter, S. W., & Read, H. (1949). New ways of gravure. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Hayter, S. W., & Read, H. (1966). New ways of gravure / S.W. Hayter; with a preface by Herbert Read. London; New York etc.: Oxford.

Ivins, W. M. (1968). Prints and visual communication. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.

Koyré, A. (1994). Pensar la ciencia (A. Beltrán, Trans.). Barcelona, España: Paidós.

Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. U.S.A.: Univeversity Chicago Press.

Losilla, E. (1998). Breve historia y técnicas del grabado artístico (Primera ed.). Xalapa, Verarcruz, México: Universidad Veracruzana.

Mayor, A. H. (1980). Prints & people: a social history of printed pictures. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Mayor, A. H. P. p. a. s. h. o. p. p. P. P., & Press., U. (1980). Prints & people: a social history of printed pictures. Princeton University, United States of America Princeton University Press.

Melot, M., Griffins, A., Field, R. S., & Béguin, A. (1981). Prints. History of an art (H. Harrison, D. Corbyn, & B. G., Trans.). Switzerland: Skira, Geneva, Rizzoli International Publications Ink.

Simone, R. (2001). La tercera fase: formas de saber que estamos perdiendo. Madrid, España: Taurus.

Vargaslugo, E. (2007). Prefacio. In Historia gráfica. Fotografías de la Academia de San Carlos1897-1940. México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM).

Wye, D. (1996). Thinking print: books to billboards, 1980-95. New York: The Museum of Modern Art: Distributed by Harry N. Abrams.

Wye, D., & Weitman, W. (2006). Eye on Europe: prints, books & multiples, 1960 to now. United States of America Museum of Modern Art.

Wye, D., & Weitman, W. (2006). Eye on Europe: prints, books & multiples, 1960 to now. New York: Museum of Modern Art.

Published

2023-12-19

How to Cite

Salazar Lamadrid, A. (2023). Paradigmatic shifts in visual arts: from technical instruction to its value within individuals. Arte, Entre paréntesis, 2(17). Retrieved from https://arteentreparentesis.unison.mx/index.php/AEP/article/view/121

Metrics

Most read articles by the same author(s)